[February 5, 2010] In the debate over cell
phones, there doesn't appear to be any consensus on what, exactly, the
harmful health effects on cell phone users may be. Unfortunately, the
scary truth is that no one knows the full extent of problems caused by
these must-have consumer electronics, because they've only become
ubiquitous in recent years.
Nevertheless, at least one group of people who has been using cell
phones longer than the rest of us has started to draw some connections.
In an extensive piece on cell phone health
hazards in
this month's issue of GQ, a 35-year-old
investment banker who five years ago was diagnosed with a brain tumor
just behind his right ear -- where he presses his phone -- said that
his industry has, "been using cell phones since 1992, back when they
were the
Gordon-Gekko-on-the-beach-kind-of-phone."
The banker said four or five colleagues at his firm also have similar
tumors.
Indeed, health experts say many often miss the fact that it can take
anywhere from 10 to 30 years for brain tumors to develop from exposure
to all kinds of electromagnetic radiation, including the kind from cell
phones.
But it doesn't always have to take so long.
LeBron James, the 24-year-old star basketball player for the Cleveland
Cavaliers had a benign parotid tumor removed in June last year.
While the cause of his tumor is undefined, radiation is likely to be
the culprit -- and cell phone use may be, too.
Both benign and malignant tumors of the parotid, a salivary gland, have
long been linked to
ionizing radiation including X-rays and gamma radiation following
environmental exposure. (Nagasaki and Hiroshima survivors are one
example.) And in a widely cited 2008 study,
parotid tumors have been linked to cell phone use.
The report includes some stats that are enough to make even the most
ardent addict consider dropping his or her iPhone or Blackberry. If
you've used your cell phone regularly for five years, your chance of
having a parotid tumor is increased by 34 percent. If you've had more
than 5,479 calls in your lifetime, your chances are upped by 58
percent. For folks who live further from big cities, prospects are even
dimmer -- your chances of getting a parotid tumor are increased by 96
percent if you have a lifetime exposure of more than 1,035 hours.
(While you might imagine living in a big city exposes you to more cell
phone radiation, in rural areas, cell phone towers are further apart so
mobile phones have to emit higher levels of radiation in order to
communicate with the nearest antenna.)
Of course, not everyone is on board with the idea that mobile phones
are bad for you. The forthcoming Interphone study,
a massive decade-long, 13-country epidemiological study of tumors among
users of mobile phones, is expected to be less alarmist than the
parotid tumor study. The problem with that study, however, is that its
$30-million price tag is being footed by none other than the wireless
industry. And the study is getting more expensive as it's been fraught
with delays, reportedly caused by the researchers'
inability to reach consensus.
In anticipation of what seems like the study's impending release, the
International Electromagnetic Field Collaborative
released a report (PDF)
last year criticizing the presumed results of the Interphone study. The
methodology is flawed, says the IEFC, because it excludes, among other
things, cordless phones, children and young adults (presumed to be
among the
more vulnerable demographics,
due to faster cell growth and thinner skulls), certain kinds of tumors
and interviews with deceased and too-sick patients.
In the IEFC report, 43 scientists from 13 countries also reviewed
evidence linking cell phone use to brain tumors. Among the studies
cited was a sobering
Swedish one that found
a 420 percent higher risk of brain cancer among people who
had started using cellular or cordless phones as teens. Older analog
cell phones, which are now mostly out of use, were found to increase
cancer risk by 700 percent.
But cell phone risks may not be limited to cancer. The group Electromagnetichealth.org,
based at Columbia University, has argued that cell phone use
creates cognitive problems, damages DNA and causes infertility in
humans. The group's experts, which include physicians, scientists,
environmental health experts and epidemiologists across the globe, also
say that cell phones cause navigation problems for wildlife,
particularly migrating species such as birds and bees.
Faced with damning reports from the scientific community, the
Senate held a hearing
on the dangers of cell phone use last September. In San Francisco,
forcing cell phone retailers to
label their products as hazardous
has support from the mayor and health activists. And for over a year
now, in France, marketing and designing cell phones for minors under 18
has been illegal. (The
law was prompted by the aforementioned Swedish study that detailed the
heightened risks for youths.)
It's clear that going forward, we'll be hearing a lot more about this
issue as a top public health concern. But what's a regular person to do
right now? What with electrical appliances, computers, Bluetooth
devices, Wi-Fi, GPS receivers and over 2,000 satellites orbiting our
planet in outer space -- to mention but a few examples --
electromagnetic pollution surrounds us all the time, even if you live
in the middle of nowhere.
The IEFC recommends people use corded landlines whenever possible (a
difficulty for those among us who've abandoned their landlines for the
convenience of cell phones). They also recommend using cell phones as
answering machines -- turning them on to check for messages and
returning calls only. Carry your phone in a purse or bag, not on your
body. Don't use your cell when you're inside a building or car because
your phone will have to emit increased levels of radiation to send out
the signal. Relying on text messages and non-wireless hands-free
devices may also reduce health risks.
Some or all of these recommendations are not practical for many of us,
particularly in a society where we are expected to be wired and
easy-to-reach at all times. But the way it's starting to look, cell
phones may be the tobacco of today. By the time we finally get the
message that we should kick the habit, it may be too late.